Stu file veni di Wikimedia Commons e purrìa èssiri adupiratu di àutri pruggetti.
Appressu veni ammustrata la discrizioni prisenti ntâ sò pàggina di discrizzioni.
Sta mmàggini cunzisti sulu n formi giomètrichi sìmplici e/o testu. Nun sùpira quinni la sogghia d'origginalità (threshold of originality) nicissaria pâ prutizzioni dô copyright, e è di cunziguenza ntô duminiu pùbblicu. Sibbeni nun havi ristrizzioni riguardu lu copyright, la mmàggini pò èssiri suggetta a àutri ristrizzioni. Talìa WP:PD § Fonts o Template talk:PD-textlogo pi chiossai nfurmazzioni.
St'òpira cunteni matiriali ca putissi èssiri suggettu ê liggi supra li marchi riggistrati nta una o chiù giurisdizzioni. Prima d'usufruiri di stu cuntinutu, pi favuri assicùrati d'aviri lu drittu d'utilizzàrilu ntô rispettu dâ liggi ca s'àpplica ê circustanzi ntê quali ntenni fàrinni usu. Sî lu sulu rispunzàbbili nta l'assicuràriti di nun nfrànciri li dritti assuciati a tali marchi riggistrati. Talìa li nostri avvirtenzi ginirali. L'usu di stu marchiu riggistratu nun ìnnica nta arcuna manera appruvazzioni o sustegnu dô titulari di parti di Wikimedia Commons o dâ Wikimedia Foundation, o viciversa. This tag does not indicate the copyright status of the attached work. A normal copyright tag is still required.See Commons:Licensing.
for images that are not creative in the sense of being a product of non-trivial "skill and judgment" as discussed below.
Unlike other common law countries, Canada's threshold of originality veers closer to that of the United States. CCH Canadian Ltd. v. Law Society of Upper Canada explicitly rejected the "sweat of the brow" doctrine for being too low of a standard, but at the same time, stated that the creativity standards for originality were too high:
A creativity standard implies that something must be novel or non-obvious — concepts more properly associated with patent law than copyright law. And for these reasons, I conclude that an “original” work under the Copyright Act is one that originates from an author and is not copied from another work. That alone, however, is not sufficient to find that something is original. In addition, an original work must be the product of an author’s exercise of skill and judgment. The exercise of skill and judgment required to produce the work must not be so trivial that it could be characterized as a purely mechanical exercise."
The same case also stated:
For a work to be “original” within the meaning of the Copyright Act, it must be more than a mere copy of another work. At the same time, it need not be creative, in the sense of being novel or unique. What is required to attract copyright protection in the expression of an idea is an exercise of skill and judgment. By skill, I mean the use of one’s knowledge, developed aptitude or practised ability in producing the work. By judgment, I mean the use of one’s capacity for discernment or ability to form an opinion or evaluation by comparing different possible options in producing the work. This exercise of skill and judgment will necessarily involve intellectual effort.
Stu file cunteni nfurmazzioni agghiuntivi, prubbabbirmenti junti dâ fotucàmira o dû scanner usati pi criàrila o diggitalizzàrila. Siddu lu file hà statu canciatu, arcuni dittagghi putìssiru nun currispùnniri â rialitati.